S4, Ep. 02: Justice Alito and religion at the Supreme Court: Previewing the new SCOTUS term

What are Amanda and Holly watching in the new Supreme Court term? They preview 303 v. Elenis, a case involving a woman who says she doesn’t want to design wedding websites for same-sex couples, and compare it to the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, in which the Court avoided the main question. Amanda and Holly also discuss an order from the Court’s “shadow docket” involving Yeshiva University’s refusal to recognize an LGBT club on campus, and they share why we’re still watching that case. Plus, hear their reaction to Justice Samuel Alito’s speech at a conference in Rome.

S4, Ep. 01: Still more to say: Review and updates on last term’s religious freedom cases from SCOTUS

The Supreme Court opened its new term this week, and Amanda and Holly look at where its last decisions are leading us. They provide updates on high-profile decisions, including the praying coach in Washington state who hasn’t returned to work yet and the dilemmas facing religious schools in Maine. Amanda and Holly lament how this Court ignores the distinctiveness of religion, despite religion’s special status in the Constitution. They view the Court as taking a major risk by leaving lower courts without better guidance. Amanda and Holly also weigh in on discussions regarding the Court’s legitimacy and remind us that we can’t just count on the Supreme Court to uphold our rights.

Chaplaincy as a calling

The Rev. Megan J. Pike knows firsthand the importance of religious liberty. A board certified chaplain, she serves at Gundersen Health System in Wisconsin.

A Christian athlete’s response to the ‘coach prayer’ case

What would it look like if Christian athletes and coaches expressed their faith by listening to each other’s stories, praying behind closed doors, dedicating themselves to radical love, and taking the overall mental, psychological, and physical health of athletes seriously instead of coercing people to pray and believe as they do?